
Peter Eisenman: Max Reinhardt Haus Project, Berlin, Germany, Scale model 1:100
1992-93. Medium-density fiberboard (MDF) and Plexiglas, 82 1/2 x 60 x 60" (209.6 x 152.4 x 152.4 cm).
"In order to capture Reinhardt's legendary energy and vision, Eisenman devised a prismatic form that is a world unto itself but also reflects the constantly changing and multifaceted character of the city. In Eisenman's design (which was never built), the thirty-four-story building vertically folds on its core to create a structure that separates, transforms, and rejoins itself horizontally at the roof level."
In other words, the operation performed by this building form is metaphorical in a conceptual sense: the act of folding and rejoining upon oneself is a hopeful gesture signifying a future of reunification and reconciliation of a disjointed past. Diagrammatically, the building is a Möbius strip that has been fragmented into triangulated surfaces, disrupting the singular surface. On a representational level, this can be interpreted as the continuous flow of time (Möbius diagram), which is interpreted through our contemporary understanding of history as fragmented, incomplete, and imprecise (faceted figures).
As a building however, with the constraints of foundations in gravity, the building must meet the ground, which obfuscates the integrity of this continuous form where the building meets the ground. As a result, the conceptual completeness of the building as a complete Möbius strip only exists in model form shown here, where the ground is ghosted in clear plexiglas.
I believe this highlights a key issue for this project: As the translation from model to building would have disrupted the formal and metaphorical diagrams of this building, so as to reconcile a theory with reality. If the building represents the totality of collective history of humanity (Germanic or otherwise) as continuous, it also acknowledges that there is a portion of this history that is always buried. However, it is this buried portion that serves as foundation as well as the missing piece that is needed to complete the loop. Eisenman here is taking an optimistic and Freudian stance with regards to this cultural history: Let's not forget what lies beneath; acknowledging our suppressed underpinnings is the key to fulfilling our collective desires for unity.